West Indies Cricket Team Vs New Zealand National Cricket Team Match Scorecard: The Full 2026 ODI Series

New Zealand needed just one more run. Mitchell Santner, on 33 not out, lofted a mistimed shot over the infield. It cleared the fielders by a matter of feet. New Zealand won by one wicket, and with it, the series. Two days later, in the very next match, it was West Indies’ turn to win by the barest of margins.

This was not a routine bilateral series it was one of the tightest ODI contests either side played all year.

Which West Indies vs New Zealand Are You Looking For?

the women’s national teams’ meeting at the 2026 T20 World Cup, and a separate bilateral tour where West Indies toured New Zealand during the 2025-26 season the opposite direction of travel from the series covered here.

This article is about the men’s senior teams’ 2026 series, played in the West Indies from 11 to 22 July.

Detail	Information
Series	New Zealand tour of West Indies, 2026
Format	5 ODIs
Dates	11-22 July 2026
Venues	Providence Stadium, Guyana; Kensington Oval, Bridgetown
Final result	New Zealand won 3-2

Full Series Result: All Five Matches at a Glance

Match	Venue	Result	Player of the Match
1st ODI, 11-12 July	Providence Stadium, Guyana	West Indies won by 7 wickets	Keacy Carty
2nd ODI, 13-14 July	Providence Stadium, Guyana	New Zealand won by 5 wickets	—
3rd ODI, 16-17 July	Providence Stadium, Guyana	New Zealand won by 6 wickets	—
4th ODI, 19 July	Kensington Oval, Bridgetown	New Zealand won by 1 wicket	Mitchell Santner
5th ODI, 21-22 July	Kensington Oval, Bridgetown	West Indies won by 2 wickets	—

Series result: New Zealand won 3-2, sealing the series with the 4th ODI before West Indies claimed a consolation win in the finale.

Why This Series Deserves More Attention Than a Routine Bilateral Tour

Five-match ODI series between two teams outside the very top tier of world cricket often get treated as background noise, especially once the result is decided before the final match is even played. That framing misses what actually happened here. Two of the five matches were decided by margins of two wickets or fewer a rate of nail-biters unusual even for a closely matched series, let alone one where the outcome had already been settled by the fourth game.

1st ODI: West Indies Take the Lead

Played at Providence Stadium, Guyana.

New Zealand innings: 267 all out (49.5 overs)

Batter	Runs	Note
Daryl Mitchell	65	Top-order platform
Will Young	49	Supporting contribution

West Indies bowling

Bowler	Wickets	Figures
Alzarri Joseph	4	4/41
Vitel Lawes	3	3/54

West Indies innings: 268/3 (48.5 overs), won by 7 wickets

Batter	Runs	Note
Keacy Carty	95	Player of the Match
Shai Hope (c)	87*	Anchored the finish

Carty and Hope’s stand carried the chase from start to finish, giving West Indies a 1-0 series lead heading into the second match.

2nd and 3rd ODI: New Zealand Level and Then Lead

Match	Result	Margin
2nd ODI	New Zealand won	5 wickets
3rd ODI	New Zealand won	6 wickets

Here’s what most series recaps get wrong about this middle stretch. They treat two comfortable wins in a row as evidence New Zealand simply took control and never looked back.

What most people miss is that these wins, while not decided by tight margins, set up the psychological platform for the series-defining 4th ODI West Indies arrived at Bridgetown already facing the prospect of a series loss, which raises the stakes of every subsequent moment considerably higher than a routine mid-series match would carry.

The 4th ODI: New Zealand’s One-Wicket Thriller

Played 19 July 2026 at Kensington Oval, Bridgetown.

Final result: New Zealand won by 1 wicket, sealing the series 3-1 with one match to spare.

West Indies innings: 188 all out (44.4 overs)

West Indies were bowled out for 188 on a surface Shai Hope himself described afterward as “certainly not a 180 type of challenge,” directly criticising his own top order’s adaptation to the conditions.

New Zealand innings: 189/9 (44.1 overs)

Batter	Runs	Balls	Note
Mitchell Santner	34*	56	Player of the Match, unbeaten at the finish
Jayden Lennox	—	—	Survived a nervy final partnership with Santner

West Indies bowling

Bowler	Wickets	Note
Sunil Motie	5	Five-wicket haul, praised by the winning captain
Alzarri Joseph	—	Strong supporting spell

New Zealand’s chase came down to the very last pair. Sunil Motie’s five-wicket haul for West Indies kept the hosts in the contest deep into the chase, alongside a strong spell from Alzarri Joseph.

Read Also:- India Women’s National Cricket Team Vs West Indies Women Match Scorecard

Turning Point: Santner’s Composure Under Maximum Pressure

Here’s what most recaps get wrong. They call this “a nervy finish” and leave it there.

But here’s the real problem with that framing New Zealand had actually lost a cluster of wickets after a rain break, turning what looked like a comfortable chase into genuine jeopardy.

Santner’s own explanation afterward reveals the specific mental approach that got his side home: “you try to chip off the totals as much as you can… even partnerships of 10, 15 at that stage was going a long way.”

What most people miss is the specific instruction Santner gave his last-wicket partner. He told Jayden Lennox to “just play straight and block it,” while he himself would “try to get 12 runs” an explicit division of labour between the two batters that reflects a calm, pre-planned approach rather than pure improvisation under pressure.

Why the Rain Break Changed the Match’s Complexion

Common mistake in reading a chase that turns tense after a weather interruption: assuming the pressure comes purely from lost momentum. In reality, a rain delay in a tight chase often changes bowlers’ rhythm and lengths just as much as it changes the batting side’s concentration, and New Zealand’s cluster of wickets after the break suggests both effects were in play simultaneously.

Practical lesson for any team managing a weather-interrupted chase: resetting a clear, simple plan immediately upon resumption exactly what Santner did with Lennox is more valuable than trying to recover the pre-break rhythm artificially.

Player Performance Breakdown: 4th ODI

• Mitchell Santner (34* off 56, Player of the Match): His own admission that New Zealand “probably shouldn’t have got that close” is a rare moment of a winning captain openly acknowledging his side made the finish harder than it needed to be, rather than presenting the win as smooth execution throughout.
• Bold opinion worth stating plainly: a captain willing to publicly critique his own team’s performance immediately after a series-clinching win reflects a genuinely honest team culture, not just diplomatic humility.
• Sunil Motie (five-wicket haul): Santner specifically praised this spell as “outstanding,” acknowledging that West Indies’ bowlers “were pretty good today” even in defeat.
• Common mistake in reading a losing bowling performance: treating five wickets in a losing cause as a footnote, when in reality Motie’s spell is the specific reason this match became a nail-biter rather than a comfortable New Zealand win.
• Shai Hope (West Indies captain): His post-match reflection was unusually self-critical, stating “we still need to show a bit more impetus, especially at the top” and taking personal responsibility by adding “myself included.”
• Counterintuitive idea worth stating plainly: a captain naming his own top order’s specific failure rather than crediting the opposition’s bowling alone is a more useful diagnostic than a generic “credit to New Zealand” quote, because it points directly at what his own team needs to fix.
• Daryl Mitchell and Will Young (earlier in the series): Their contributions across the series’ first three matches established New Zealand’s top-order platform that the middle and lower order, including Santner, would later rely on to close out tight finishes.

The 5th ODI: West Indies Salvage Pride

Played 21-22 July 2026 at Kensington Oval, Bridgetown. With the series already decided, West Indies chased down New Zealand’s 268/9, finishing 269/8 in 47.3 overs to win by 2 wickets.

Batter	Runs	Note
Shimron Hetmyer	69*	Anchored the successful chase
Jayden Seales	—	Unbeaten at the crease when the winning runs were struck

What people think vs reality: a “dead rubber” fifth match, played after the series had already been decided, is often assumed to carry little competitive intensity. This match proves that assumption wrong West Indies producing another nail-biting finish, their second one-or-two-wicket margin of the series, shows a team playing for genuine pride rather than simply going through the motions once the trophy was already gone.

The Historical Context Behind This Rivalry

West Indies and New Zealand have built a long-standing ODI rivalry across decades, with results often swinging heavily depending on conditions and the specific squads each side fields for a given tour. This series continued that pattern of competitiveness rather than one team establishing clear superiority.

Common mistake in assessing a bilateral series result: treating a 3-2 series score as a marginal, almost coincidental outcome. In a five-match series specifically, a 3-2 result after New Zealand had already sealed the series with a game to spare actually reflects two distinct competitive periods New Zealand’s dominant middle stretch, followed by two evenly poised finishes on either end of the series.

Why Playing on Two Different Venues Mattered

This series was split between Providence Stadium in Guyana and Kensington Oval in Bridgetown, and the shift in location coincided with a shift in the series’ competitive balance. The first three matches at Providence produced one West Indies win and two comfortable New Zealand wins, while the switch to Bridgetown for the final two matches produced the tightest cricket of the entire series.

Practical observation worth noting for anyone tracking multi-venue series: conditions specific to each ground can meaningfully affect not just individual results but the overall rhythm and tension of a series, and assuming a team’s form is consistent across different surfaces within the same tour is a common analytical error.

What Each Team’s Bowling Attack Revealed Across the Series

Bowler	Team	Standout Moment
Alzarri Joseph	West Indies	4/41 in the 1st ODI, restricting New Zealand’s total
Vitel Lawes	West Indies	3/54 in the 1st ODI, supporting Joseph’s new-ball impact
Sunil Motie	West Indies	Five-wicket haul in the 4th ODI, in a losing cause
Mitchell Santner	New Zealand	Sealed the 4th ODI with the bat, capping a series where his all-round value stood out

Looking at the bowling contributions across the series, West Indies’ attack was not the reason they lost the series. Joseph and Lawes combined effectively in the opener, and Motie’s five-wicket haul in the 4th ODI was, by any measure, an excellent bowling performance.

Bold opinion worth stating plainly: if West Indies’ bowling attack had been paired with even slightly more consistent batting execution at the top of the order across the middle three matches, this series could very plausibly have gone the other way. The gap between these two teams, based on the bowling evidence alone, was considerably smaller than the eventual 3-2 series result might suggest to a reader who only looks at the final scoreline.

A Practical Framework for Judging Close Bilateral Series

Series like this one, decided by 3-2 with two matches settled by a single wicket or two, deserve a more nuanced reading than simply recording the winner and moving on.

A useful framework for any reader assessing a similarly tight series: separate the “comfortable” results from the “marginal” ones, and weigh the marginal results more heavily when judging which team actually played better cricket overall. By that standard, this series was close to an even contest decided by a handful of specific moments Santner’s calm partnership management in the 4th ODI, and Hetmyer’s composure in the 5th rather than a clear demonstration of one team’s overall superiority.

What Decided the Series

Factor	West Indies	New Zealand
Matches won	2	3
Tightest margins	2 wickets (5th ODI)	1 wicket (4th ODI)
Best individual batting performance	Keacy Carty, 95 (1st ODI)	Daryl Mitchell, 65 (1st ODI)
Best individual bowling performance	Sunil Motie, five-for (4th ODI)	Alzarri Joseph, 4/41 (1st ODI)
Recurring issue	Top-order batting adaptation, per Shai Hope’s own admission	None significant flagged publicly by New Zealand’s camp

Read Also:- England Women’s National Cricket Team Vs Australia Women’s National Cricket Team Match Scorecard

Bold opinion worth stating plainly: this series wasn’t decided by a talent gap. It was decided by New Zealand’s middle and lower order specifically Santner handling pressure marginally better than West Indies’ top order across the tightest moments. Shai Hope’s own repeated public acknowledgment of his top order’s shortcomings, rather than any single dominant New Zealand performance, is the most honest explanation of why the series went the way it did.

What Both Teams Should Take Into Their Next Assignments

For West Indies, Shai Hope’s own diagnosis points to the clearest practical fix: the top order needs to adapt more quickly to surfaces that don’t support the same scoring rates as flatter conditions, rather than continuing an approach better suited to easier batting tracks.

Practical decision for the team management: dedicating specific preparation time to reading and adjusting for tricky, lower-scoring surfaces, rather than assuming the same batting method works everywhere, would directly address the exact issue Hope flagged twice across the series.

For New Zealand, the lesson is about depth rather than correction. A team that can win a series-clinching match through a last-wicket partnership, built on a specific and simple pre-planned approach, has genuine depth extending to its bowlers as batters.

Practical takeaway for any touring side: cultivating that kind of composure throughout the batting order, not just among specialist batters, is exactly what turns a competitive series into a won one when matches are decided by the smallest possible margins.

Key Highlights and Records

Highlight	Detail
Series result	New Zealand won 3-2
Tightest finish	4th ODI, decided by 1 wicket
Best individual score	Keacy Carty, 95 (1st ODI)
Best bowling figures	Sunil Motie, five-wicket haul (4th ODI, losing cause)
Series-sealing performance	Mitchell Santner, 34* and Player of the Match (4th ODI)
Consolation-match hero	Shimron Hetmyer, unbeaten 69 (5th ODI)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)